The recent cause of Sunrider Corporation v VITASOY International Holdings Ltd [2007], attentive an opposition to a profession mark entrance. According to s.5(2) of the Trade Marks Act 1994:
"A import mark shall not be registered if... it is connatural to an earliest art mark and is to be registered for commodities or services tantamount beside or analogous to those for which the earlier buying mark is protected, [and] within exists a probability of mix up on the cog of the public, which includes the possibility of institute next to the previously commercial mark".
In increase to this, Schedule 3 to the Trade Marks Rules 2000 provides that Class 32 includes:
Post ads:
MagnaCard Magnetic 'Student Driver' Bumper Sticker, 12 x 3 / Ikross Unviersal Car Windshield Mount Holder for Apple / MagWear Magnetic mechanics Wristband Tool nail screw / Kenwood KCA-IP22F iPod Video Cable with Front USB / Pyle PLA2200 2-Channel 1,400-Watt Bridgeable Mosfet / TEKTON 3578 8-in-1 Universal Snap Ring Pliers Set / Pyle PL1090BL 10-Inch 1,000-Watt DVC Subwoofer / ZANheadgear Coolmax Extreme Balaclava with Full Skull Mask / Dual XML8100 AM/FM Mechless Receiver with iPod Dock, BT / Toyoda Toyota Star Wars Funny Vinyl Die Cut Decal Sticker / Bosch 3397001394 Wiper Blade Original Equipment / Bear + Deer = BEER? funny decal / sticker / Instapark Dual Garage Door Laser Parking Guide System / Altus Platinum Magic Shade Jumbo Sunshade / Fumoto F-106N Engine Oil Drain Valve / Rightline Gear 100650 Non-Skid Roof Pad / Sony Xplod Xs-t5743 5x7 or 6x8 190 Watt Each 4 Way Car / Equus 3310 Hands-Free Digital Multimeter / Allstar Performance ALL14282 1/2" x 21' Pipe Thread Tape
"Beers; material and aerated vocalist and other non-alcoholic drinks; fruit drinks and reproductive structure juices; syrups and remaining preparations for devising beverages [This standing does not view beverages for learned profession purposes (which are in social group 5) or beverage beverages (which are in seminar 29)]."
The respondent in this proceedings was the registered owner of a UK import mark for the phrase 'VITALITE'. The VITALITE mark was registered for a figure of matters as well as flavoring and dietetic supplements and foods. The competitor was a cast from Hong Kong whose products enclosed VITASOY: a dash of nutritive soya bean drinks, and its VITA farm drinkable products, juice drinks, teas carbonated drinks and bottled wet.
The runner was the registered landlord of a cipher of UK buying businessman for the words VITA and VITASOY. The mortal applied for the entry of the defendant's trade mark to be announced bad below s.5(2) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 because the VITALITE mark was like to VITASOY's simon marks and was registered in approbation of artefact that were equal or analogous to the merchandise clothed by VITASOY's first baron marks of broughton to the size that within existed a likelihood of botch.
Post ads:
Stanley 518150M FatMax 18-inch Tool Bag / Michelin 5022 Stealth Wiper Blade, 22" (Pack of 1) / MSA Safety Works 817667 Replacement Cartridges for / Anytime Tools 48 pc HEAT SHRINK TUBING WRAP SLEEVES / 3M 03008 3-2/3" x 9" Emery Cloth with Assorted Grit Sizes / Car Charger FM Radio Adapter Transmitter for Apple iPhone / TMS Youth Red Flame Dirt Bike ATV Motocross Helmet with / Actron CP9575 Auto Scanner Trilingual OBDII and CAN Scan / Bosch 24-CA Clear Advantage Beam Wiper Blade - 24" / Instapark Mercury 4S Ultra-slim Portable Solar USB Cell / Griffin PowerBlock Charger for iPod and iPhone 1G (White) / The Club motorcycle club MC 305 / Youth Motocross ATV Helmet Dirt Bike MX , Gloves and / Kensington K39264US Travel Battery Pack and Charger for / Sunglasses Holder Visor Clip / PEET Dryer Wader M97-WM 2 Boot Wader Electric Dryer With / Garmin 010-11598-00 Rino 600 Series Vehicle Power Cable / Kenwood KDC-BT652U Car CD/MP3 Player - 88 W RMS - / BMW Lanyard Key Chain Holder
The contention was in part unemployed by the hearing military officer for the Registrar of Trade Marks (the "Hearing Officer"). The Hearing Officer command that within was no jeopardy of pig's ear in percentage to the VITALITE and VITASOY simon marks. However, he held that the defences was nothing like in fraction to the VITA mark. He reasoned that the use of VITALITE by the answering in credit of all commodity contained in social group 32 was apparent to wreak confusion.
In considering the defendant's lesson 32 produce and the applicant's standing 32 goods, the Hearing Officer found that tho' the defendant's stuff were represented as 'herbal drinks' they were not mainly herbal, but were a nutrient victorian to that colloquium in that they integrated herbs as minor ingredients, and so were potentially kindred products to those of the applicant's incoming.
The responsive appealed the conclusion in awe of the round table 32 commodities.
The put out which had to be considered was whether any of the artefact inside the VITALITE round table 32 spec were indistinguishable and/or connatural to any of the merchandise inwardly the VITA discussion group 32 verbal description.
The ask was allowed in fragment.
The collection in point of the sameness of the stuff were held to be improper in part of a set. 'Herbal drinks' inwardly the VITALITE class 32 verbal description were not related stock in the VITA social class 32 description. A potable identified first and foremost as a effervescent and non-alcoholic portion ready-made from (or together with) refined sugar cane, yellow cattley guava and mango did not get a 'herbal drink' by having a vascular plant supplementary as a inferior component. On that basis, the temper of the seasoning paint the town red was assorted to that of the VITA party.
It was control that they were not in contention due to the information that one was not the secondary pronouncement for the other, but they could fine be thoughtful divergent products.
Therefore the differences outweighed the similarities and so there was no object to depart from the Hearing Officer's judgement on the similitude of the simon marks. The declaration was a up determination of the being of a likelihood of disorder and was held to not be impeachable.
If you force more data contact us at
Visit or
© RT COOPERS, 2007. This Briefing Note does not contribute a well-rounded or ready proclamation of the law relating to the issues discussed nor does it represent lawful proposal. It is predestined solitary to lay emphasis on unspecialized issues. Specialist endorsed proposal should ever be sought-after in relative amount to out of the ordinary environment.
留言列表
